Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] iSCSI MQ adoption via MCS discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/9/2015 1:26 AM, Mike Christie wrote:
<SNIP>
I am not sure if we want this to be a deciding factor. I think the
session wide lock is something that can be removed in the main IO paths.

A lot of what it is used for now is cmd/task related handling like list
accesses. When we have the scsi layer alloc/free/manage that, then we
can simplify that a lot for iser/bnx2i/cxgb*i since there send path is
less complicated than software iscsi.


Completely agree. We should assume that other than session-wide command
sequence numbers nothing is synced across connections.

It is also used for the state check but I think that is overkill.


I have a piped patch to remove this completely redundant spin_lock that
protects a check on a state that can change right after the spin_unlock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux