On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 19:05:58 +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote: > Especially since one very strange piece of code seems to be written in > such a way that a NUL needs to be placed where a NUL is present already. > The author probably meant to fill the last byte of the buffer with a NUL > instead. But regardless of that: that isn't necessary since snprintf() > already guarantees NUL termination for buffers sizes > 0 and <= INT_MAX. > --- Forgot to: Signed-off-by: Giel van Schijndel <me@xxxxxxxxx> -- Met vriendelijke groet, With kind regards, Giel van Schijndel -- Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advice.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
