Re: Clarification for Persistent Reservation + All Registrants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry to come to this late, but I have one addition ...

On 12/13/2014 10:27 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 08:33 +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 17:53 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 00:52 +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 14:59 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> lots of SNIP
>>
>> There is no reservation until a reserve command is issued.  Once an all
>> registrants reservation is issued, by any registered initator, all
>> registered initators then become the reservation holder.
>>
> 
> So based on the above, the issue raised by Ilias where once the original
> All Registrants reservation is released, the other registrations lose
> their 'implicit' reservation until someone does another RESERVE +
> type=All Registrants is a bug.

U belive your target Nicholas is working correctly. See that other
thread for more details.

> 
> Working on a proper bugfix for this now.
> 
> Thanks James!
> 
> --nab
> 


-- 
Lee Duncan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux