Looks good, thanks Rickard.
Acked-by: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
On 06/01/2014 03:13 PM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.
>
> This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> index d70587f..add019b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
> @@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ static int
> pm80xx_get_encrypt_info(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> {
> u32 scratch3_value;
> - int ret;
> + int ret = -1;
>
> /* Read encryption status from SCRATCH PAD 3 */
> scratch3_value = pm8001_cr32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_SCRATCH_PAD_3);
> @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ pm80xx_get_encrypt_info(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> pm8001_ha->encrypt_info.status = 0xFFFFFFFF;
> pm8001_ha->encrypt_info.cipher_mode = 0;
> pm8001_ha->encrypt_info.sec_mode = 0;
> - return 0;
> + ret = 0;
> } else if ((scratch3_value & SCRATCH_PAD3_ENC_MASK) ==
> SCRATCH_PAD3_ENC_DIS_ERR) {
> pm8001_ha->encrypt_info.status =
> @@ -1004,7 +1004,6 @@ pm80xx_get_encrypt_info(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> scratch3_value, pm8001_ha->encrypt_info.cipher_mode,
> pm8001_ha->encrypt_info.sec_mode,
> pm8001_ha->encrypt_info.status));
> - ret = -1;
> } else if ((scratch3_value & SCRATCH_PAD3_ENC_MASK) ==
> SCRATCH_PAD3_ENC_ENA_ERR) {
>
> @@ -1028,7 +1027,6 @@ pm80xx_get_encrypt_info(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> scratch3_value, pm8001_ha->encrypt_info.cipher_mode,
> pm8001_ha->encrypt_info.sec_mode,
> pm8001_ha->encrypt_info.status));
> - ret = -1;
> }
> return ret;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
