Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: Handle power-on reset unit attention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> As per SAM there is a status precedence, with any sense code 29/XX
> taking second place just after an ACA ACTIVE status.
> Additionally, each target might prefer to not queue any unit
> attention conditions but just report one.
> Due to the above this will be that one with the highest precedence.
> This results in the sense code 29/XX effectively overwriting any
> other unit attention.
> Hence we should report the power-on reset to userland so that
> it can take appropriate action.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux