Can I get a second review on this one from anyone? On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:34:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Calling the workqueue interface on uninitialized work items isn't a > good idea even if they're zeroed. It's not failing catastrophically only > through happy accidents. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > index f0b4cdbfceb0..d66c4ee2c774 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ static void virtscsi_ctrl_done(struct virtqueue *vq) > virtscsi_vq_done(vscsi, &vscsi->ctrl_vq, virtscsi_complete_free); > }; > > +static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct *work); > + > static int virtscsi_kick_event(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, > struct virtio_scsi_event_node *event_node) > { > @@ -260,6 +262,7 @@ static int virtscsi_kick_event(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, > struct scatterlist sg; > unsigned long flags; > > + INIT_WORK(&event_node->work, virtscsi_handle_event); > sg_init_one(&sg, &event_node->event, sizeof(struct virtio_scsi_event)); > > spin_lock_irqsave(&vscsi->event_vq.vq_lock, flags); > @@ -377,7 +380,6 @@ static void virtscsi_complete_event(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, void *buf) > { > struct virtio_scsi_event_node *event_node = buf; > > - INIT_WORK(&event_node->work, virtscsi_handle_event); > schedule_work(&event_node->work); > } > > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ---end quoted text--- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html