On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:27:52PM +0400, James Bottomley wrote: > > I'm happy with eliminating "Unhanndled Error Code" because that is > misleading ... we should only get there if we have a DID_X return and > they're all fatal errors which will be printed. > > I'm less happy removing "Unhandled Sense Code". The danger is that we > get some harmless sense code we should have handled and instead error > the command. Since for this error we know the next print will be the > sense code, what about changing it to "Failing Command with sense code:" It's ok with me, I'm going to resend the patch in a few minutes. Thanks, Maurizio Lombardi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
