Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: Introduce blk_rq_completed()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 27/05/2014 12:21, James Bottomley ha scritto:
I could also see us one day extending the TMF capability to abort any
running command, which would make even an assertion of block timed out
or completed invalid.

Actually the assertion would remain valid, and that's exactly what Bart wants to document with this assertion.

"Completed" from the point of view of the block layer really means "do not run the softirq". If you wanted to abort any running command, you still would mark the request as completed for the block layer before issuing the TMF.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux