Re: dangling pointers and/or reentrancy in scmd_eh_abort_handler?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 23/05/2014 03:28, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage) ha scritto:
Depending on the transport, there may be a race condition between
the command status and the ABORT TASK response; the ABORT TASK
response might get back first.  I think that means
scsi_eh_abort_handler's call to scsi_finish_command could
happen during or after scsi_softirq_done has called
scsi_finish_command.

That was my doubt, in fact. But actually Bart explained that this is not the case. Either scsi_eh_abort_handler will be called via the work item, or the command will never be sent to the softirq.

Paolo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux