Re: dangling pointers and/or reentrancy in scmd_eh_abort_handler?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/19/14 16:08, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 2) reentrancy: the softirq handler and scmd_eh_abort_handler can run
> concurrently, and call scsi_finish_command without any lock protecting
> the calls.  You can then get memory corruption.

I'm not sure what the recommended approach is to address this race. But
it is possible to address this in the LLD. See e.g. the srp_claim_req()
function in the SRP LLD and how it is invoked from the reply handler,
the abort handler and the reset handlers in that LLD.

Bart.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux