On 06.01.2014 07:39, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 01/05/14 21:39, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 01/05/14 01:13, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> The following command has been used to verify that the kernel-doc >>> tool no longer complains about undocumented fields: >>> >>> scripts/kernel-doc -html drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c \ >>> include/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.h >srp-transport-doc.html >> >> Thanks for the patch. >> I guess that your tree is different from mine. Using 3.13-rc7, I still get >> 3 warnings: >> >> Warning(drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c:620): No description found for parameter 'scmd' >> Warning(drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c:688): No description found for parameter 'rport' >> Warning(drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_srp.c:697): No description found for parameter 'rport' >> >> I also had some trouble with the patch itself -- looks like some of its longer >> lines were broken (split) by your mail app (I'm guessing). >> The first split line is marked below. > > Sorry but it seems like my e-mail client line-wrapped the patch. Does > the attached patch work better ? The attached patch should be identical > to what I posted except for the line wrapping. I do not see the warnings > mentioned above - maybe these were introduced by the line wrapping ? Hi Bart, the patch you've attached works fine and looks good. Thanks! Great work with the ib_srp code in 3.13 by the way! Acked-by: Sebastian Riemer <sebastian.riemer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
