Re: CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, James Bottomley wrote:

> On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 13:24 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > James:
> > 
> > Is there any good reason why CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN still doesn't 
> > default to Y?
> 
> Assuming we've got all the screw ups (mostly CD ROMS) blacklisted, I
> think the only real reason is that some SCSI-2 devices don't respond to
> stuff not on LUN 0, so it keeps the boot process quick.
> 
> There isn't really any reason to change it, though, is there?  The
> option only applies to SCSI-2 and below devices which should be a self
> obsoleting class as their motors start to burn out.

I'm asking because every now and then we hear from somebody who built a
kernel without SCSI_MULTI_LUN and then doesn't understand why his USB
card reader seems to support only one type of card.  (The interfaces
for different digital card types typically are presented as different
logical units on USB card readers.)

This isn't a big deal; if boot-up time is a real reason for not
defaulting to Y, that's fine.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux