Re: CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 13:24 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> James:
> 
> Is there any good reason why CONFIG_SCSI_MULTI_LUN still doesn't 
> default to Y?

Assuming we've got all the screw ups (mostly CD ROMS) blacklisted, I
think the only real reason is that some SCSI-2 devices don't respond to
stuff not on LUN 0, so it keeps the boot process quick.

There isn't really any reason to change it, though, is there?  The
option only applies to SCSI-2 and below devices which should be a self
obsoleting class as their motors start to burn out.

James



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux