Re: Is there any plan to support 64bit lun in mainline?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13-10-14 11:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:32:22PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
However, there are two other patchsets pending (EH Deadline and
asynchronous command aborts), both of which have been tested
thoroughly _and_ have acked-by from various other parties.
None of these patchset had received any feedback from James
Bottomley, let alone any indication if or when they'll be merged.

So I stopped sending further patchsets, sensing some communication
breakdown on the line.

Maybe we'll need to start a common scsi staging tree for all patches
that have gotten a wide amount of reviews and are interesting to many
parties.  Thay way we have one common set of patches for the
distributions to pull from, and a tree to develop against where
dependencies between the patchsets exist.

Sounds like a good idea. Like Hannes I have several patches
that haven't been rejected but seem to have been lost in
the process:
  - expand the SG_SCSI_RESET ioctl() to include non reset
    escalating variants
  - permit the sg driver to accept SCSI cdbs greater than
    16 bytes long (bsg already can)

Also I have done some work in sg3_utils to support 64 bit
LUNs in Linux. That work assumes the solution proposed by Hannes.

Doug Gilbert

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux