RE: [PATCH][SCSI] megaraid_sas: Fix synchronization problem between sysPD IO path and AEN path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 9:18 PM
>To: Saxena, Sumit; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: jbottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Desai, Kashyap; aradford@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH][SCSI] megaraid_sas: Fix synchronization problem
>between sysPD IO path and AEN path
>
>On 10/17/2013 05:10 PM, Saxena, Sumit wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 7:35 PM
>>> To: Saxena, Sumit; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: jbottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Desai, Kashyap; aradford@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH][SCSI] megaraid_sas: Fix synchronization problem
>>> between sysPD IO path and AEN path
>>>
>>> On 10/16/2013 01:34 PM, Sumit.Saxena@xxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> There is syncronization problem between sysPD IO path and AEN path.
>>> Driver maintains instance->pd_list[] array, which will get updated(by
>>> calling function megasas_get_pd_list[]), whenever any of below events
>>> occurs-
>>>
>>> Hi Sumit,
>>> - I'm a bit confused here- there are two threads which might access
>>> the same array, but the problem is still there  when the second
>>> thread accesses the array during the final memcpy, I have expected
>>> that you will add some locking,  but maybe I'm missing something.
>>> - now the code zeroes the pd_list even when the  (ret == 0 &&
>>> (ci->count < (MEGASAS_MAX_PD_CHANNELS *
>>> MEGASAS_MAX_DEV_PER_CHANNEL)))
>>>  is not true. This is I think new - is that intentional?
>> Tomas,
>>
>> Having lock to synchronize this will be a good choice, but will need
>changes in multiple places.
>> Without this patch: driver memsets instance->pd_list[] array to zero,
>same array will be accessed in sysPD IO path, that creates problem.
>>
>> To resolve this issue, we introduced a new array "instance-
>>local_pd_list[]" array, which we will be filling from Firmware DMAed
>data and then finally memcpy that array to the "instance->pd_list[]".
>Since "instance->pd_list" is accessed in IO path, then no problem in
>memset zero here(memset is on "instance->local_pd_list").
>>
>> Final "Memcpy" operation is not saved with locking, reason is:
>"instance->pd_list" array is of type "struct megasas_pd_list", which is
>of 32-bit, so single entry in "instance->local_pd_list" array will be
>copied in one CPU cycle, and with current MR FW design, it will not be a
>problem even if IO path (or any other thread) is accessing old instance-
>>pd_list[]. so we are safe here in memcpy() here.
>>
>> Adding lock will add overhead in IO path, which could be avoided is
>main reason to resolve this issue with this fix.
>
>Thanks, what remains is my second question
>- now the code zeroes the pd_list even when the (ret == 0 && (ci->count
>< (MEGASAS_MAX_PD_CHANNELS * MEGASAS_MAX_DEV_PER_CHANNEL))) is not true.
>This is I think new - is that intentional?

Thanks for pointing this out, it's unintentional and memcpy() should be done only when (ret == 0 && (ci->count < (MEGASAS_MAX_PD_CHANNELS * MEGASAS_MAX_DEV_PER_CHANNEL))) is true, it did not cause problem because if (ret == 0 && (ci->count < (MEGASAS_MAX_PD_CHANNELS * MEGASAS_MAX_DEV_PER_CHANNEL))) is not true, still driver will memcpy "instance->local_pd_list" to "instance->pd_list", inspite of both arrays being 
same(extra overhead of memcpy, which is not needed). I will send out the updated patch.
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sumit
>>
>>
>>> Thanks, Tomas
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> MR_EVT_PD_INSERTED
>>>> MR_EVT_PD_REMOVED
>>>> MR_EVT_CTRL_HOST_BUS_SCAN_REQUESTED
>>>> MR_EVT_FOREIGN_CFG_IMPORTED
>>>>
>>>> At same time running sysPD IO will be accessing the same array
>>> instance->pd_list[], which is getting updated in AEN path, because
>>>> of this IO may not get correct PD info from instance->pd_list[]
>array.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Adam Radford <adam.radford@xxxxxxx>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@xxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
>>> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
>>>> index 0c73ba4..e9e543c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
>>>> @@ -1531,6 +1531,7 @@ struct megasas_instance {
>>>>  	struct megasas_register_set __iomem *reg_set;
>>>>  	u32 *reply_post_host_index_addr[MR_MAX_MSIX_REG_ARRAY];
>>>>  	struct megasas_pd_list          pd_list[MEGASAS_MAX_PD];
>>>> +	struct megasas_pd_list          local_pd_list[MEGASAS_MAX_PD];
>>>>  	u8     ld_ids[MEGASAS_MAX_LD_IDS];
>>>>  	s8 init_id;
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
>>> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
>>>> index e62ff02..83ebc75 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
>>>> @@ -3194,21 +3194,23 @@ megasas_get_pd_list(struct megasas_instance
>>> *instance)
>>>>  	     (le32_to_cpu(ci->count) <
>>>>  		  (MEGASAS_MAX_PD_CHANNELS * MEGASAS_MAX_DEV_PER_CHANNEL)))
>>> {
>>>> -		memset(instance->pd_list, 0,
>>>> +		memset(instance->local_pd_list, 0,
>>>>  			MEGASAS_MAX_PD * sizeof(struct megasas_pd_list));
>>>>
>>>>  		for (pd_index = 0; pd_index < le32_to_cpu(ci->count);
>>> pd_index++) {
>>>> -			instance->pd_list[le16_to_cpu(pd_addr->deviceId)].tid
>>> 	=
>>>> +			instance->local_pd_list[le16_to_cpu(pd_addr-
>>>> deviceId)].tid	=
>>>>  				le16_to_cpu(pd_addr->deviceId);
>>>> -			instance->pd_list[le16_to_cpu(pd_addr-
>>>> deviceId)].driveType	=
>>>> +			instance->local_pd_list[le16_to_cpu(pd_addr-
>>>> deviceId)].driveType	=
>>>>  							pd_addr->scsiDevType;
>>>> -			instance->pd_list[le16_to_cpu(pd_addr-
>>>> deviceId)].driveState	=
>>>> +			instance->local_pd_list[le16_to_cpu(pd_addr-
>>>> deviceId)].driveState	=
>>>>  							MR_PD_STATE_SYSTEM;
>>>>  			pd_addr++;
>>>>  		}
>>>>  	}
>>>>
>>>> +	memcpy(instance->pd_list, instance->local_pd_list,
>>>> +		sizeof(instance->pd_list));
>>>>  	pci_free_consistent(instance->pdev,
>>>>  				MEGASAS_MAX_PD * sizeof(struct MR_PD_LIST),
>>>>  				ci, ci_h);
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
>scsi"
>>> in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo
>>>> info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux