On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:10:43PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 12:48:21PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > Make pci_msix_table_size() to return a error code if the device > > does not support MSI-X. This update is needed to facilitate a > > forthcoming re-design MSI/MSI-X interrupts enabling pattern. > > > > Device drivers will use this interface to obtain maximum number > > of MSI-X interrupts the device supports and use that value in > > the following call to pci_enable_msix() interface. > > Hmmm... I probably missed something but why is this necessary? To > discern between -EINVAL and -ENOSPC? If so, does that really matter? pci_msix_table_size() is kind of helper and returns 0 if a device does not have MSI-X table. If we want drivers to use it we need return -EINVAL for MSI-X incapable/disabled devices. Nothing about -ENOSPC. > tejun -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@xxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
