> -----Original Message----- > From: geert.uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:geert.uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Geert Uytterhoeven > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 1:40 AM > To: KY Srinivasan > Cc: Mike Christie; Jack Wang; Greg KH; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ohering@xxxxxxxx; jbottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Drivers: scsi: FLUSH timeout > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:53 PM, KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I am not sure how that magic number was arrived at (the 60HZ number). We > want this to be little higher - > > "60 * HZ" means "60 seconds". > > > would there be any issues raising this to say 180 seconds. This is the value we > currently have for I/O > > timeout. > > So you want to replace it by "180 * HZ", which is ... another magic number? Ideally, I want this to be adjustable like the way we can change the I/O timeout. Since that has been attempted earlier and rejected (not clear what the reasons were), I was suggesting that we pick a larger number. James, let me know how I should proceed here. Regards, K. Y > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
