Re: [PATCH 10/21] [SCSI] nsp32: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oops, you're absolutely correct.  Thanks for the follow up!  Please
change it as follow as you mentioned:

Acked-by: GOTO Masanori <gotom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Best regrads,
-- gotom

2013/4/29 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Friday 26 April 2013, Masanori Goto wrote:
>> 2013/4/25 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we
>> > should use mdelay instead for those.
>> >
>>
>> Singed-off-by: GOTO Masanori <gotom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks. I assume you mean "Acked-by", not "Singed-off" as in "burnt"
> or "Signed-off" as a notification that you have applied it to your
> own git tree.
>
> I'll keep the patch with an your "Acked-by" line in my tree unless
> James wants to apply to the scsi tree.
>
>         Arnd
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux