> Well, looking at QLogic and Emulex both emulate a bus reset with a
> loop over each target and invoke a target reset there.
> I somewhat fail to see the rationale behind it, other than emulating
> the bus reset behaviour on SPI.
> Given that the original target reset already failed (otherwise we
> wouldn't be doing a bus reset), I doubt a _second_ target reset
> will lead to a different result.
>
> So invoking REMOVE I_T NEXUS here can only improve matters :-)
>
> I'm all for renaming bus_reset, though :-)
>
Since modern storage fabrics don't really have a "bus" to reset any more, a bolder approach of getting rid of bus_reset might be warranted.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
