On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 17:32 -0500, James Smart wrote: > Given path switching is somewhat separate from the i/o, would it better > to send a notification of a path-fail condition as part of the eh, > rather than hinging it on the individual i/o. Yes, the i/o is still in > limbo and can't be switched to the new path, but other i/o could without > incurring the delay. Is there a potential issue with a write that is taking a long time on one path, which could cause path switching for subsequent writes to another path, before the disposition of the first write is known? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
