Hello,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 08:27:29PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> If I do not receive further feedback I'll start testing the patch below
> (on top of the patch at the start of this thread):
Yeah, it generally seems fine to me. This makes Chanho's patch
unnecessary, right? Just some minor points.
> @@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ struct request_queue {
> #define QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM 16 /* Contributes to random pool */
> #define QUEUE_FLAG_SECDISCARD 17 /* supports SECDISCARD */
> #define QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_FORCE 18 /* force complete on same CPU */
> +#define QUEUE_FLAG_DRAINED 19 /* queue tear-down finished */
This is rather confusing to me. Maybe we can have QUEUE_FLAG_DYING
and QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD? Or at least explain the involve state changes in
detail.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
