On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Dan Williams <djbw@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 06:50 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On 08/29/12 05:12, Dan Williams wrote: >> > John reports: >> > BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [kworker/u:8:2202] >> > [..] >> > Call Trace: >> > [<ffffffff8141782a>] scsi_remove_target+0xda/0x1f0 >> > [<ffffffff81421de5>] sas_rphy_remove+0x55/0x60 >> > [<ffffffff81421e01>] sas_rphy_delete+0x11/0x20 >> > [<ffffffff81421e35>] sas_port_delete+0x25/0x160 >> > [<ffffffff814549a3>] mptsas_del_end_device+0x183/0x270 >> > >> > ...introduced by commit 3b661a9 "[SCSI] fix hot unplug vs async scan race". >> >> Including that call stack in the patch description may create the >> misleading impression that this only occurs with the mptsas driver. This >> lockup also happens with at least the iSCSI initiator. See also >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/24/340. > > I don't think it does that. The title is pretty generic, but you're > right the impact is potentially all scsi_remove_target() users. > >> By the way, in order to get a patch in the stable tree the proper "Cc:" >> tag should be added in the patch description but the >> stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx e-mail address should be left out from the >> Cc-list of the e-mail with the patch. > > No, we talked about that at kernel summit. It's ok for the stable@ > alias to get a few extra mails. The patch won't be applied until it > hits mainline and in the meantime it gives a heads up to the -stable > folks, or anyone that wants to follow up on stable patches making their > way to mainline. > It appears that this did not get into 3.6 rc4 (unless I am reading the changlog wrong). Do I have to file an official bug report to get this noticed? John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
