On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 10:50 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 07/16/12 22:28, David Dillow wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 18:07 -0400, Mike Christie wrote: > >> Not sure about the ping code, but I think the dev loss tmo and fast io > >> fail related stuff should go to scsi_transport_template. We can then add > >> some common code to start the timers/delayed_work_queues, stop them, > >> set/get the value from sysfs, etc that all the transport classes can > >> then call. > > > > Good idea, I'll look into doing this as part of it. > > (replying to an e-mail of one month ago) > > Hello Dave, > > Have you already been able to make some progress with this work ? If the > patches for moving the shared parts of dev_loss_tmo / fast_io_fail_tmo > handling from scsi_transport_fc to scsi_transport_template would be > available in a reasonable timeframe I could adapt my ib_srp patch series > to take advantage of that work. I've not made it very far; the same high priority project at work has trumped this for too long. The only good news is that there is light at the end of the tunnel, as we have a big demo at the end of the month. After that, I should be able to spend more cycles on this again. -- Dave Dillow National Center for Computational Science Oak Ridge National Laboratory (865) 241-6602 office -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
