On 07/16/12 22:28, David Dillow wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 18:07 -0400, Mike Christie wrote: >> On 01/14/2012 05:56 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> Add the necessary functions in the SRP transport module to allow >>> an SRP initiator driver to implement transport layer recovery. >> >> I was updating my iscsi dev loss patch when I saw this is still not merged. > > Yes, I got part way into doing a rework of Bart's code before I got > sidetracked on another project. Cognizant of the looming merge window, > I'm desperately trying to get back to it. > >> Not sure about the ping code, but I think the dev loss tmo and fast io >> fail related stuff should go to scsi_transport_template. We can then add >> some common code to start the timers/delayed_work_queues, stop them, >> set/get the value from sysfs, etc that all the transport classes can >> then call. > > Good idea, I'll look into doing this as part of it. (replying to an e-mail of one month ago) Hello Dave, Have you already been able to make some progress with this work ? If the patches for moving the shared parts of dev_loss_tmo / fast_io_fail_tmo handling from scsi_transport_fc to scsi_transport_template would be available in a reasonable timeframe I could adapt my ib_srp patch series to take advantage of that work. Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
