On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:12 PM, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 19:39 +0530, Venkatraman S wrote: >> From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Currently the UFS host driver has returned incorrect values for SUCCESS >> and FAILED. Fix it to return the correct value to the upper layer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Santosh Y <santoshsy@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The signoff chain here doesn't make sense. It needs to be signed off by > you, not by Andrew since you're the one sending the patches. Signoffs > follow the way the patch is transmitted, so it needs author (it has) > followed by maintainer ack (it has) followed by signoff of the person > sending the patch to the list (that's you) which is missing. > Apologies - I took these patches from linux-next directly. I'll send again with my Sign-Off. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
