Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/3] drivers/scsi/ufs: fix incorrect return value about SUCCESS and FAILED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 19:39 +0530, Venkatraman S wrote:
> From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Currently the UFS host driver has returned incorrect values for SUCCESS
> and FAILED.  Fix it to return the correct value to the upper layer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Santosh Y <santoshsy@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The signoff chain here doesn't make sense.  It needs to be signed off by
you, not by Andrew since you're the one sending the patches.  Signoffs
follow the way the patch is transmitted, so it needs author (it has)
followed by maintainer ack (it has) followed by signoff of the person
sending the patch to the list (that's you) which is missing.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux