On 5/22/2012 1:45 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 11:35 -0700, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi wrote:
On 5/21/2012 11:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 09:18 -0700, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi wrote:
On 4/24/2012 3:26 PM, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi wrote:
James, can you please include this patch set in the next round of 3.4+
merge window?
I was waiting for you to respond to Mike Christie's comment about using
list_for_each_entry_safe() or list_entry().
James, I responded to Mike Christie's comment. Here is the link for the
thread - http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=133643754200805&w=2.
Ah, OK, you broke threading, which is why I didn't get this. You need
to reply to the message on the list. Your reply has:
References:<4FA85912.2030800@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to:<4FA85912.2030800@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
But the actual message is:
Message-id:<4FA39836.3070907@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Evolution matches threads by the in-reply-to fields.
Thanks for the information, James. I'll take care of it from next time.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
