On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 11:35 -0700, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi wrote: > On 5/21/2012 11:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 09:18 -0700, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi wrote: > >> On 4/24/2012 3:26 PM, Bhanu Prakash Gollapudi wrote: > >> > >> James, can you please include this patch set in the next round of 3.4+ > >> merge window? > > > > I was waiting for you to respond to Mike Christie's comment about using > > list_for_each_entry_safe() or list_entry(). > > James, I responded to Mike Christie's comment. Here is the link for the > thread - http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=133643754200805&w=2. Ah, OK, you broke threading, which is why I didn't get this. You need to reply to the message on the list. Your reply has: References: <4FA85912.2030800@xxxxxxxxxxxx> In-reply-to: <4FA85912.2030800@xxxxxxxxxxxx> But the actual message is: Message-id: <4FA39836.3070907@xxxxxxxxxxx> Evolution matches threads by the in-reply-to fields. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
