On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 18:49 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2012 23:09:27 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > > So that means your testing with it now, right..? > > Our kernel has diverged too much from yours to easily move patches > back and forth, so no. > > But more importantly, we still don't have a complete patchset. > Ok, I've pushed into lio-core the following WIP patches based on your original patch + s_id + loop_id clearing patch from today: 6fc162d3 tcm_qla2xxx: Clear session s_id + loop_id earlier during shutdown dfebe3b5 tcm_qla2xxx: Convert to TFO->put_session() usage ec7cf009 target: Add TFO->put_session() caller for HW fabric session shutdown Today I've been testing these changes against typical active I/O during tcm_qla2xxx endpoint shutdown, and against explict NodeACL + MappedLUNs removal case. So far with active FCP of the order of ~100K IOPs with random mixed mode 4K blocks, these patches are performing session shutdown and unloading tcm_qla2xxx references as expected. Certainly these need more testing wrt to a number of special cases for active I/O shutdown, but I think they look reasonable enough to put into lio-core for now.. Please have a look and let me know if you have any problems getting it applied for testing into your .39 tree. Thanks, --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
