Re: [PATCH 4/4] virtio_blk: use disk_name_format() to support mass of disks naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Ren Mingxin <renmx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Hi, He:
>
>
> On 03/30/2012 07:22 PM, Asias He wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Ren Mingxin<renmx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>>
>>>  The current virtblk's naming algorithm only supports 263  disks.
>>> If there are mass of virtblks(exceeding 263), there will be disks
>>> with the same name.
>>
>> This fix is pretty nice. However, current virtblk's naming still
>> supports up to 18278 disks, no?
>> ( index 0  ->  vda, index 18277 ->  vdzzz ).
>
>
> Sorry, I intended to type 26^3+ (26^2+26)...
> It may still be a restriction which should be improved though.

OK.

-- 
Asias He
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux