Re: [PATCH v8 09/13] libsas: enforce eh strategy handlers only in eh context

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 00:45 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>> The strategy handlers may be called in places that are problematic for
>> libsas (i.e. sata resets outside of domain revalidation filtering /
>> libata link recovery), or problematic for userspace (non-blocking ioctl
>> to sleeping reset functions).  However, these routines are also called
>> for eh escalations and recovery of scsi_eh_prep_cmnd(), so permit them
>> as long as we are running in the host's error handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c |   15 +++++++++++----
>>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
>> index f0b9b7b..1cabedc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
>> @@ -463,11 +463,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sas_get_local_phy);
>>  /* Attempt to send a LUN reset message to a device */
>>  int sas_eh_device_reset_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>>  {
>> -     struct domain_device *dev = cmd_to_domain_dev(cmd);
>> -     struct sas_internal *i =
>> -             to_sas_internal(dev->port->ha->core.shost->transportt);
>> -     struct scsi_lun lun;
>>       int res;
>> +     struct scsi_lun lun;
>> +     struct Scsi_Host *host = cmd->device->host;
>> +     struct domain_device *dev = cmd_to_domain_dev(cmd);
>> +     struct sas_internal *i = to_sas_internal(host->transportt);
>> +
>> +     if (current != host->ehandler)
>> +             return FAILED;
>
> Doing this will ensure that SG_SCSI_RESET now fails.
>
> I don't mind checking for O_NONBLOCK in the sg handler and failing if it
> is, but disallowing everything looks a trifle drastic.
>

The thought process here was following the lead of libata which does
not specify eh_reset handlers.  We can't permit "unmanaged" (outside
of eh) resets to hit ata devices otherwise we run the risk of a reset
turning into a link bounce / hotplug.

...and I can't take the same route as I did for the scsi_transport_sas
initiated reset since these handlers are called from both ioctl and eh
context, or can I?

Hmm, what about something like:

  if (current != host->ehandler) {
    schedule_reset_to_run_in_eh_context():
    wait_for_eh();
  } else
    do_reset();

--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux