On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 14:25 -0800, Andrew Vasquez wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > I think the most important item is to sort out the mess around the old > > generation qla23xx support. The way the code currently sprinkles ifs > > around that is a complete mess. Given that the qla23xx support has as > > far as I know zero test coverage, and has been EOLed by qlogic I see > > no reason to keep it around. > > > > Anyone disagreeing with that? > > > > Christoph, > > >From an engineering and support perspective it doesn't make sense to > keep the (unsupported and untested) pre-ISP24xx codes around. Going > forward, once internal resources can be allocated, QLogic would like > to see support for all ISP24xx and above hardware. > > Regards, > Andrew Vasquez > Hi Andrew, Thanks for the official clarification here from Qlogic wrt to pre 24xx hardware support in qla_target.c. We will go ahead and begin dropping the legacy support and plan to have all the old code removed for an RFC-v5 series to be posted after the holidays. Thank you, --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
