On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I think the most important item is to sort out the mess around the old > generation qla23xx support. The way the code currently sprinkles ifs > around that is a complete mess. Given that the qla23xx support has as > far as I know zero test coverage, and has been EOLed by qlogic I see > no reason to keep it around. > > Anyone disagreeing with that? > Christoph, >From an engineering and support perspective it doesn't make sense to keep the (unsupported and untested) pre-ISP24xx codes around. Going forward, once internal resources can be allocated, QLogic would like to see support for all ISP24xx and above hardware. Regards, Andrew Vasquez -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
