James, I resent all the patches with numbers added to each patch. Also the patches which need to be back ported to stable, I put Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx in the patch and resent. Regards, Nagalakshmi -----Original Message----- From: James Bottomley [mailto:jbottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 9:30 PM To: Nandigama, Nagalakshmi Cc: linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Desai, Kashyap; Prakash, Sathya; Moore, Eric Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpt2sas: Description Patch On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 10:19 +0530, nagalakshmi.nandigama@xxxxxxx wrote: > Please consider this patch set for next kernel release. > > Signed-off-by: Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandigama@xxxxxxx> > --- > [PATCH 01/10] mpt2sas : MPI next revision header update. > [PATCH 02/10] mpt2sas : New feature Fast Load Support. > [PATCH 03/10] mpt2sas : Fix for system hang when discovery in progress. > [PATCH 04/10] mpt2sas : Fix for issue - Failure message displayed during diag reset. > [PATCH 05/10] mpt2sas : Fix for issue - Drives not getting properly deleted if sas cable is removed > while host reset is active. > [PATCH 06/10] mpt2sas : Fix for dead lock occurring between host_lock and sas_device_lock. > [PATCH 07/10] mpt2sas : Fix for deadlock between hot plug worker threads and host reset context. > [PATCH 08/10] mpt2sas : Fix for issue Port Reset taking long time(around 5 mins) to complete > while issued during creating a volume. > [PATCH 09/10] mpt2sas : Fix for Panic when inactive volume is tried deleting. > [PATCH 10/10] mpt2sas : Bump driver version to 10.100.00.00 None of the patch numbers made it to the actual patches. This makes for an incredibly annoying cross reference job trying to apply them, could you just resend with the numbering in the Subject of each patch. Also several of the ones labelled fix look like they're candidates for backport to stable, are they? James ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
