On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 12:20 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:13 -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > > Firstly, could we get the serious bug fixes identified and separated > > from the general enhancement updates, so they can go in a fixes tree > > without depending on enhancements? The former category would include > > the /proc interface removal, since we don't want the legacy interface to > > be in a released kernel. > > > > Everything in those two series should be considered bug fixes and > immediate for-38 mainline material. Things like this: target: remove EXTRA_CFLAGS target: Remove unnecessary container_of() pointer check target: Remove unnecessary se_clear_dev_ports legacy code target: Remove spurious double cast from structure macro accessors target: Convert TMR REQ/RSP definitions to target namespace target: Minor sparse warning fixes and annotations target: Remove unneeded test of se_cmd Are not serious bug fixes. I could go either way on some of the error path changes. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
