On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:43 PM, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 22:04 +0800, BingJiun Luo wrote: >> I want to measure SATA AHCI Host controller read performance. Open >> /dev/sda and using read(int fildes, void *buf, size_t nbyte) user space >> function to read 2048 times, each time 64KByets, and total 128 Mbytes. >> >> I measured the time start from one step before write CI register inside >> ahci_qc_issue() function until ahci_port_intr () is called in the interrupt >> context. It takes about 1 milliseconds to complete one 256KBytes READ >> DMA EXT command, and spend about 15 microseconds call to scsi_done(). >> >> However, why scsi_request_fn is called about after 4 milliseconds >> to pass next IO request for Hardware to issue? It take less if the READ >> DMA command with less number of sectors. > > I'm not sure I parse the question, but I think you're asking why we > chain the next issue from the softirq in SCSI? That's because most SCSI > devices are tagged and the bus is the bottleneck, so after processing > the completion, we need to get the next command out ASAP to keep the bus > utilised to capacity. I observed that each time scsi_request_fn is called, scsi_dispatch_cmd is called only once and then return. It means that only one IO request available to be processed by Host Contoller. After time passed about 4 milliseconds, scsi_request_fn is called again. Why it takes so long time, because the previous command already completed in only about 1 millisecond, including call to scsi_done(). The host controller is idle about 3 milliseconds, has nothing to do. > >> My questions are: >> 1. Is it the time to prepare one 256 KB READ DMA EXT command by upper >> layer (Block Layer or Virtual File system Layer)? Or, It is the time to copy >> data from kernel space memory to user space memory after data is read >> back from Hard Drive and delay the next command pass to SCSI? > > Everything in SCSI is done with zero copy (as in we DMA straight to the > pagecache page, which is then attached to userspace). > Yes, I know it is zero copy at SCSI, but I am not sure at upper layer(VFS or anything else). It is unlikely to zero copy between kernel space and user space memory buffer, right? Because no matter the data read back from disk or already available inside the page cache, both of them are located at kernel space memory, and this data have to be copied into user space address. All of these works are not done in the SCSI layer, somewhere higher than SCSI, just I don't know where?. >> I know some architecture has not good enough performance to do memcpy >> or something like that. >> >> 2. If I do not mount /dev/sda to any file system, what is the first >> kernel function >> called after read() function from user space? Is it located at VFS or >> directly to >> Block layer? > > I think you need to trace this for yourself ... it's complex because > read doesn't go to the device, it goes via the page cache, which is also > how the VFS operates. If the pages are all current in the cache, a > read() doesn't have to trouble the disk. > I am pretty sure almost all READ DMA commands go to the disk, because I captured them by Catalyst Analyzer. So, if all request must go to disk, does it means the data not available in the page cache. >> Because I want to keep track the time spend at the layer higher than SCSI. >> >> 3. When scsi_done() is called, what is the function to process this completed >> command and pass the data to user space? I think there might be somewhere >> inside the code to copy this data from kernel space memory address to user >> space memory address. > > scsi_done doesn't do anything about completion, it triggers the block > softirq to schedule a completion for us when all interrupts are > processed. > > James > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
