On Thu, Jan 27 2011 at 5:41pm -0500, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 17:35 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18 2011 at 7:01am -0500, > > Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On 01/18/2011 12:33 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > > > > > > This patchset is primarily for fixing up multipathing, > > > which has the habit of retrying failed I/Os on the > > > next path. For some errors this is just pointless > > > (eg MEDIUM ERROR), for some errors this is the desired > > > behaviour (namely transport errors), and for others > > > this is positively damaging (persistent reservation > > > failures). > > > Just plain EIO simply don't cover the whole range :-) > > > > > > > > > > > BTW might "vulgo" be "ergo" [Latin: therefore]? > > > > > > > Nope. Correct etymology is from 'sermo vulgaris', > > > ie the language of the common people. > > > But maybe I should remove it for the next > > > round to avoid confusion. > > > > Is a new round even needed given there haven't been any code issues > > raised against v4? > > > > James, what are your thoughts on this patchset? Would be great to get > > this in scsi-misc for 2.6.39 > > > > Please advise, > > Well, it covers three subsystems ... I was waiting for Alasdair and Jens > to ack ... but I bet they each were waiting for the other two to ack ... > > So, I'll take it if no objections. OK, I just sent a mail to jens and alasdair asking the same ;) Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
