On Tue, Jan 18 2011 at 7:01am -0500, Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/18/2011 12:33 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > > This patchset is primarily for fixing up multipathing, > which has the habit of retrying failed I/Os on the > next path. For some errors this is just pointless > (eg MEDIUM ERROR), for some errors this is the desired > behaviour (namely transport errors), and for others > this is positively damaging (persistent reservation > failures). > Just plain EIO simply don't cover the whole range :-) > > > > > BTW might "vulgo" be "ergo" [Latin: therefore]? > > > Nope. Correct etymology is from 'sermo vulgaris', > ie the language of the common people. > But maybe I should remove it for the next > round to avoid confusion. Is a new round even needed given there haven't been any code issues raised against v4? James, what are your thoughts on this patchset? Would be great to get this in scsi-misc for 2.6.39 Please advise, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html