On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 01:21:56PM -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> This patch changes iscsi_queuecommand_lck() to a host_lock less
> iscsi_queuecommand() that will internally disable interrupts using
> session->lock and drop the now legacy host_lock unlock.
I think this patch is buggy. Before, iscsi_queuecommand_lck is called with
interrupts disabled. Now, it's called with interrupts disabled. Elsewhere,
session->lock is acquired with bh's disabled:
void iscsi_put_task(struct iscsi_task *task)
{
struct iscsi_session *session = task->conn->session;
spin_lock_bh(&session->lock);
So I think you need to convert the
spin_lock(&session->lock);
in iscsi_queuecommand_lck to at least a spin_lock_bh, and possibly
a spin_lock_irq -- it's not clear to me whether it needs to exclude
against interrupt context, or only BH context. In some places, it's
taken with spin_lock_irqsave().
I'd play it safe and use _irq, but someone more confident with this code
might choose to only use _bh.
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> index c15fde8..5535782 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
> @@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ enum {
> FAILURE_SESSION_NOT_READY,
> };
>
> -static int iscsi_queuecommand_lck(struct scsi_cmnd *sc, void (*done)(struct scsi_cmnd *))
> +int iscsi_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *sh, struct scsi_cmnd *sc)
> {
> struct iscsi_cls_session *cls_session;
> struct Scsi_Host *host;
> @@ -1609,13 +1609,11 @@ static int iscsi_queuecommand_lck(struct scsi_cmnd *sc, void (*done)(struct scsi
> struct iscsi_conn *conn;
> struct iscsi_task *task = NULL;
>
> - sc->scsi_done = done;
> sc->result = 0;
> sc->SCp.ptr = NULL;
>
> host = sc->device->host;
> ihost = shost_priv(host);
> - spin_unlock(host->host_lock);
>
> cls_session = starget_to_session(scsi_target(sc->device));
> session = cls_session->dd_data;
> @@ -1706,7 +1704,6 @@ static int iscsi_queuecommand_lck(struct scsi_cmnd *sc, void (*done)(struct scsi
>
> session->queued_cmdsn++;
> spin_unlock(&session->lock);
> - spin_lock(host->host_lock);
> return 0;
>
> prepd_reject:
> @@ -1716,7 +1713,6 @@ reject:
> spin_unlock(&session->lock);
> ISCSI_DBG_SESSION(session, "cmd 0x%x rejected (%d)\n",
> sc->cmnd[0], reason);
> - spin_lock(host->host_lock);
> return SCSI_MLQUEUE_TARGET_BUSY;
>
> prepd_fault:
> @@ -1732,12 +1728,10 @@ fault:
> scsi_out(sc)->resid = scsi_out(sc)->length;
> scsi_in(sc)->resid = scsi_in(sc)->length;
> }
> - done(sc);
> - spin_lock(host->host_lock);
> + sc->scsi_done(sc);
> return 0;
> }
>
> -DEF_SCSI_QCMD(iscsi_queuecommand)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iscsi_queuecommand);
>
> int iscsi_change_queue_depth(struct scsi_device *sdev, int depth, int reason)
> --
> 1.7.3.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
