Re: [ANNOUNCE] Status of unlocked_qcmds=1 operation for .37

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I would have to agree that approach does make a bit more sense..  Now
> can some brave soul (/me looks at ak) code another script to automate
> this for the identified legacy LLDs cases that need push down..?

For the drivers I looked at it doesn't really make too much difference,
I don't think there was any with a really large number of returns.
You can see that in the diffstat for the full changes.

Writing another script is probably not too hard, but the problem
is that I needed a significant amount of manual post processing
(both the select the right files to patch and to get rid
of misplaced newlines and some mismatches in cocci) 
So it's not a fully automated procedure.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux