Re: [ANNOUNCE] Status of unlocked_qcmds=1 operation for .37

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This sounds like a pretty reasonable compromise that I think is slightly
> less risky for the LLDs with the ghosts and cob-webs hanging off of
> them.

They won't get tested either next release cycle. Essentially
near nobody uses them.

> 
> What do you think..?

Standard linux practice is to simply push the locks down. That's a pretty
mechanical operation and shouldn't be too risky

With some luck you could even do it with coccinelle.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux