Re: [ANNOUNCE] Status of unlocked_qcmds=1 operation for .37

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I disagree with your approach this introduces a spin_unlock_irqrestore
> call site at every return, in the usually huge queuecommand.

I converted the full tree and in practice it turns out there 
are very few returns in nearly all queuecommands. So it won't
make much difference.

Longer term they will be all hopefully gone again anyways.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux