Re: xfs rm performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:03:00PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> I traced what XFS is doing that time. The initiator is sending by a _single command at time_ the following pattern:

That's exactly the queue draining we're talking about here.  To see
how the pattern gets better use the nobarrier option.

Even with that XFS traditionally has a bad I/O pattern for metadata
intensive workloads due to the amount of log I/O needed for it.
Starting from Linux 2.6.35 the delayed logging code fixes this, and
we hope to enable it by default after about 10 to 12 month of
extensive testing.

Try to re-run your test with

	-o delaylog,logbsize=262144

to see better log I/O pattern.  If you target doesn't present a volatile
write cache also add the nobarrier option mentioned above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux