On 05/26/2010 11:08 PM, Yang, Bo wrote: > Tomas/James, > > >> Also descriptive subjects would be nice (parts I-III may do well for >> Lord of the Rings ... it's less useful for SCSI patches). >> >> This is again a question for the original author. Bo? >> > I changed the description and resubmit them already. > Thanks Bo. I've noticed [PATCH 1/7] scsi: megaraid_sas - Online Controller Reset - I: Change the Chips related functions and Add the Chip reset functions [PATCH 2/7] scsi: megaraid_sas - Online controller Reset Support (OCR)-II : Driver return RESET in timeout routine do you want for the part III to stay with the subject 'Online controller Reset'? What is more important for me is that in Patch 1/7 you still have spaces instead of tabs and the patch can't be applied. The same for patch 3/7. You can see the spaces for example here http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg43842.html Tomas > Bo Yang > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tomas Henzl [mailto:thenzl@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 11:48 AM > To: James Bottomley > Cc: Yang, Bo; 'linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'akpm@xxxxxxxx'; 'linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; Daftardar, Jayant > Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] scsi: megaraid_sas - Add three times Online controller reset - V2 > > On 05/25/2010 07:32 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > >> On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 18:17 +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote: >> >> >>> V2: I've cleaned up some coding style issues and removed a variable, the functionality shouldn't be changed >>> >>> Tomas >>> >>> If fw didn't raise the interrupt with the fw state change to driver and fw goes to failure state, driver >>> Will check the FW state in driver's timeout routine and issue the reset if need. Driver will do the OCR upto three >>> Times until kill adapter. Also driver will issue OCR before driver kill adapter even if fw in operational state. >>> >>> >> So there's supposed to be a replacement for 3/7 (megaraid_sas - Online >> COntroller Reset (OCR) PART-III) as well, isn't there? >> >> > Yes, I think there are some issues that could be removed, on the other side > it is mostly coding style related, so I think it could be accepted as it is. > I hope I could afterwards clean something up. (The patches as they are now don't > apply correctly on my system, it's maybe an issue with my mail reader.) > > > >> Also descriptive subjects would be nice (parts I-III may do well for >> Lord of the Rings ... it's less useful for SCSI patches). >> >> > This is again a question for the original author. Bo? > > Tomas > > > >> James >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> > N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{���"�{ay� ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z� �w��� ���j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+��ݢj"��!tml= -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
