From: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@xxxxxxxxx> When starting a new response sequence in a multi-sequence exchange, a warning was issued that sequence initiative wasn't held. The bug was that sequence initiative was cleared by the previous sequence due to the END_SEQ flag being on. The intent may have been to check LAST_SEQ. Change just to check SEQ_INIT. Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c index 7f43647..1ad1ded 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int fc_seq_send(struct fc_lport *lport, struct fc_seq *sp, */ spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock); ep->f_ctl = f_ctl & ~FC_FC_FIRST_SEQ; /* not first seq */ - if (f_ctl & (FC_FC_END_SEQ | FC_FC_SEQ_INIT)) + if (f_ctl & FC_FC_SEQ_INIT) ep->esb_stat &= ~ESB_ST_SEQ_INIT; spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock); return error; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
