Re: [PATCH 06/11] qla4xxx: added srb referance counter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 01 Feb 2010, Mike Christie wrote:
> 
> On 01/30/2010 12:28 AM, Ravi Anand wrote:
> >
> > -		msleep(2000);
> > -	} while (max_wait_time--);
> > +		if (got_ref&&  (atomic_read(&rp->ref_count) == 1)) {
> > +			done++;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		msleep(ABORT_POLLING_PERIOD);
> 
> 
> Did you want to use krefs for the refcounting?

We will add it to our to do list and submit a patch later on.
For right now we will like to stick to it as kref will require
additional testing.

> And why is this so funky (got_ref arg and refcount peak) compared to the 
> qla2xxx one?

I don't think qla2xxx is doing any reference counting in eh_abort() path. 
Basically its trying to differentiate for case where it takes an additional
reference when the cmd is with the F/W. In that case if its the last guy, 
then it can go ahead and complete the command.

Hope this helps.

THanks
Ravi



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux