On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 16:30 +0100, John Hughes wrote: > John Hughes wrote: > > One problem with the patch is that, since I don't have a page 7 (bay > > names) it's using the "enclosure component index" as the name, and > > that (at least for me) seems to be an index starting from zero, where > > my bays are numbered from one. > > > > sg_ses shows a "bay number", I think I'll try to make the patch look > > for the bay number and make the name something like "bay-nn" if there > > is a bay number. > Doesn't work because bays without a device don't show a bay number and > hot-plugging a device doesn't make things change dynamically. Let me dig around in the standards. My instinct from the implementation notes was that page 7 was more likely to be present than page 10, so that's how I coded it. There may still be a way to get the slot number in a persistent fashion without the actual page telling you this. > Buggeration. Welcome to the wonderful world of SCSI standards implementation. James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
