On 11/01/2009 01:52 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Boaz, > > On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:25:43 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Yes I can see now linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h and linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h look >> broken, they do not include headers who's definitions are used. All the other alternatives >> in linux/unaligned/ ,example access_ok.h, do. Sigh >> >> But one thing I do not understand, in linux-next is there not a single ARM platform that >> does a "make allmodconfig". (Or they do but the compilation error was never reported?) > > The arm allmodconfig is really a non starter I am told (allmodconfig is > really per arch, not per platform). However you can see all the > linux-next build results for arm (and lots of others) at > http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/ . I often don't have time > to review the build results - I assume that other people with an interest > will do so. > >From the list you've sent (above), there is not a single ARM platform that does an allXXXconfig. They are all a "defconfig". I'll bear that in mind next time. (Time for that arm cross compiler) Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
