Re: DIF/DIX updates for 2.6.32

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:49 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 08/27/2009 09:34 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>>> "Boaz" == Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> > Boaz> I know that we also have the above problem with iscsi and
> > Boaz> data-digest such that when we come to sign the data it might
> > Boaz> change on us before the target receives it.
> > 
> > Yep, I have the same problem.  I talked to Andrew Morton a couple of
> > months ago and he said that modifying pages in flight is "a feature" as
> > far as ext[234] is concerned.
> > 
> 
> As you might know, I have a filesystem copied from the ext2 code base.
> I'm experimenting with altering the behavior so that pages written to
> while been IOed will page fault, then sleep, until IO is done.
> Clearly this is a good "feature" until such systems like mirror or signed-
> data that are forced to reallocate-copy all IO do to the 2% optimization
> that thing gives you.

What about reads to the page?  If you allow them, you get the situation
where something signals a write intent, tries to write and gets put into
wait, then the readers get the old data still.

> At the final outcome I hope for a VFS support on a flip of a flag or
> something. So under laying device can turn that "feature" off when it
> means grate performance gains in it's operations.
> 
> If any one has thought about that problem, and as some preliminary strategies,
> please I'm all hears. I've just started on this subject and currently I do not
> have a clue.

The correct way to handle this is simply to dump the page being written.
It's dirty and was updated after the last write attempt, so it gets
re-written out.  It costs nothing and it's incredibly fast.

What you likely want is a way of telling that the page got re-written so
you don't need to print out scary warning messages about parity
problems.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [SCSI Target Devel]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux