On 08/27/2009 09:34 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>>>>> "Boaz" == Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Boaz> I know that we also have the above problem with iscsi and > Boaz> data-digest such that when we come to sign the data it might > Boaz> change on us before the target receives it. > > Yep, I have the same problem. I talked to Andrew Morton a couple of > months ago and he said that modifying pages in flight is "a feature" as > far as ext[234] is concerned. > As you might know, I have a filesystem copied from the ext2 code base. I'm experimenting with altering the behavior so that pages written to while been IOed will page fault, then sleep, until IO is done. Clearly this is a good "feature" until such systems like mirror or signed- data that are forced to reallocate-copy all IO do to the 2% optimization that thing gives you. At the final outcome I hope for a VFS support on a flip of a flag or something. So under laying device can turn that "feature" off when it means grate performance gains in it's operations. If any one has thought about that problem, and as some preliminary strategies, please I'm all hears. I've just started on this subject and currently I do not have a clue. Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
